Company News

In the previous part, we discussed how Gtrontec addresses the two fundamental challenges of industrial AI—localization mismatch and hallucination—by integrating industrial knowledge context and building a dual-mode, dual-track, dual-know-how engineering governance system, allowing AI to finally understand factory jargon and provide reliable advice. But this is just the first step. A more critical question arises: do we dare to let AI truly take action?

From Point Intelligence to Systemic Collaboration: Redefining Human-AI Decision Division

Real-world industrial problems, such as yield anomalies in semiconductor production lines, are far too complex for a single AI model to handle. They require the sequential collaboration of multiple AI agents for perception, analysis, decision-making, and execution. If these agents operate in isolation, the information chain breaks, and the entire closed loop fails.

Gtrontec's solution is agent collaboration engineering. Its core is not to replace humans with AI, but to establish a set of risk-tiered human-AI collaboration rules.

Low-risk, high-frequency, routine scenarios—such as daily data monitoring, report generation, and equipment status inspection—are handled autonomously by AI agents, which record results without human intervention. High-risk, high-value scenarios—such as adjusting core process parameters, approving major change orders, or executing line start/stop operations—require mandatory final confirmation (Human-in-the-Loop) from an engineer with appropriate permissions before execution. Additionally, if the AI detects missing information or logical conflicts during execution, it must proactively raise a counter-query rather than infer on its own.

Take the AI Auto-Pilot decision hub implemented for a leading advanced semiconductor wafer fab as an example. The standardized workflow for the Octopus Brain to handle a major production line anomaly is: Step 1—Perception: The perception agent captures yield fluctuations exceeding statistical control thresholds in real time from tens of thousands of data streams per second. Step 2—Insight: The analysis agent automatically retrieves small root cause analysis models related to the anomaly time, machine, and process step, and combined with historical case knowledge base, generates an analysis report with root cause probability ranking and data evidence chain. Step 3—Decision: The decision agent integrates the analysis report, recommended action plan (e.g., locking a specific chamber, adjusting a parameter to a suggested value), and impact assessment into a decision package, which is pushed to the duty engineer's mobile terminal for a single confirmation instruction. Step 4—Execution: After confirmation, the execution agent sequentially invokes industrial software according to preset permissions, e.g., calling MES for Hold Lot, calling EAP to modify target Recipe, and calling RMS to trigger maintenance work orders. Step 5—Feedback and Accumulation: The execution agent continuously tracks key indicators. Once the anomaly is resolved, the complete event data (trigger conditions, analysis process, decision basis, execution actions, result feedback) is automatically packaged into a standard case and stored in the knowledge base to optimize future model judgments.

After implementing this workflow, the average closure time for critical anomalies in the fab has been reduced from hours to minutes. The engineer's core responsibility has shifted from "handling alarms and systematic troubleshooting" to "reviewing AI-generated decision packages and confirming," transforming their role from passive responder to active verifier, significantly reducing cognitive load and time cost for problem resolution.

Breaking the Black-Box Trust: Building Engineered Safety and Audit Systems

After establishing human-AI collaboration rules, a deeper barrier remains: why should engineers trust AI's closed-loop actions? Gtrontec addresses this with three engineering designs that make AI actions transparent, controllable, and traceable.

Execution Environment Isolation (Sandboxing): All data processing, code execution, and instruction generation by AI agents occur in a "sandbox" computing environment isolated from the core production network (e.g., MES/EAP communication networks). This environment uses one-way data import and instruction output with logical gates. Even if the AI model malfunctions or is attacked, its erroneous instructions cannot directly affect the physical production line, fundamentally isolating risk.

Hierarchical Access Control: Each AI agent and the tools it can invoke (e.g., Tool/Action) are assigned clear risk-level labels. For example, a "Report Generation Agent" is granted read-only access to the corresponding database and cannot initiate any parameter changes. Only a specially authorized "Advanced Execution Agent" deployed on an isolated channel can call high-risk operations such as locking machine tools or modifying Recipe. Access follows the principles of "least privilege" and "dynamic application."

Full-Chain Auditable Logging: The system records every API call, every natural language input/output, every decision node's input evidence and output conclusion, and every execution action's instruction text and return result. All logs are encrypted, tamper-proof, and timestamped, supporting post-event full-process review in a "black box" manner. Engineers can clearly trace: "at what time, based on which data, which agent proposed what plan, who confirmed, what action was taken, and what was the result."

Only when AI behavior becomes a transparent system—with verifiable inputs, understandable logic, traceable processes, and isolatable risks, rather than an opaque black box—can engineers and managers in industrial environments grant it true production control authority.

The Execution Power of Industrial AI: Truly Transforming Industry Productivity

A technology substantively changes an industry when its application can complete production tasks with lower overall cost and higher reliability. Since its strategic incubation by TCL in 2018, Gtrontec has become a leading industrial AI company in China, serving over 30,000 enterprises and implementing hundreds of AI projects. Its systematic approach to solving the most tedious and stubborn engineering challenges in AI deployment clearly demonstrates this progression.

The era of industrial AI is arriving. Its hallmark is not a series of press releases about large model parameters, but companies like Gtrontec that are willing to immerse themselves in noisy workshops, systematically reducing the time, labor, and trial costs of industrial decision-making and execution without compromising safety. When these issues are resolved one by one, industrial AI transforms from a flashy technology demo into the fundamental productivity that drives China's manufacturing toward higher quality, efficiency, and resilience.