1. Quality anomaly detection has lag
Quality feature values are difficult to predict in real-time, unable to intercept and reduce losses timely and effectively.
2. Long processing cycle for quality anomaly issues
After quality anomalies occur, relying on engineers' experience to manually pull, integrate, and analyze data is time-consuming and labor-intensive, causing production delays and economic losses.
3. Reliance on manual experience
Process parameter adjustments rely on manual experience, leading to large fluctuations in product quality.
4. Incomplete data monitoring
Lack of a complete data management system, fragmented scenarios, dispersed meters, making on-site data collection difficult.